I felt like writing the first part; the follow-up, not so much.
After a king-hell panic attack on the morning of the ophthalmologist's appointment (like, let's get him to the doctor and find out why he's acting like he's got the DTs), I finally managed to make it to the ophthalmologist's another day.
Long story short: cataract in the right eye, about 75 percent developed -- taking my otherwise sterling -14.25 vision to something closer to -22, and uncorrectable.
Cataract in the left eye, getting started, enough to justify replacement of both lenses -- the ones that fit in my head.
After a literal lifetime of blurry vision, and 47 years of a foreign object on my face, I go into the doctor this week for the first of two surgeries to restore my sight to a place it's never been . . . fingers crossed.
And the new "another set of eyes" -- courtesy of some biomedical lab somewhere -- should get a good spin around the block rather quickly. February and March are already crazy.
addendum
I didn't mean to cut it that short. I'm not wanting to jinx anything, but it's obviously on my mind. And I don't want to talk too much. I fear the czarina was over it long ago.
I've begun to wonder what "blind" really means. I always presumed "darkness." But someone with two eyes of the current condition of my right eye could not live without assistance -- yet could "see" a whole range of things. As some guy I spoke to locally said a few months back, even before I knew about the recent developments, "People who don't see like we do don't understand that, for them, a speck of light in a dark room is a speck, but for us, it's a big glow." Exactly right, and I never thought of it that way.
Just like with, uh, Rush Limbaugh, who did his show while "deaf" for three months. I can't imagine that "deaf" in that case meant "entirely without receiving any sound." If it was, that's a hell of an accomplishment -- and I don't understand it. (Then again, I don't understand radio.)
Time for Dr. Frankenstein to replace a few bolts.
along with some comments on the world of a freelance editor
What It Is (posts below left; rate sheet, client list, other stuff below right)
My name is Bob Land. I am a full-time freelance editor and proofreader, and occasional indexer. This blog is my website.
You'll find my rate sheet and client list here, as well as musings on the life of a freelancer; editing, proofreading, and indexing concerns and issues; my ongoing battles with books and production; and the occasional personal revelation.
Feel free to contact me directly with additional questions: landondemand@gmail.com.
Thanks for visiting. Leave me a comment. Come back often.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Another Set of Eyes, Part 1
It’s not a cliché as much as a commonsense statement that
might spill out of anyone’s mouth: “This document needs another set of eyes.”
That’s what I’ve been doing, one way or the other, for most of my life: serving
as someone’s other set of eyes. Publishers are people, too, my friend.
“Another set of eyes” is shorthand for “I’m so tired of this
document that I don’t want to think about it anymore. I’ve long lost any
perspective on it, and I’m certain that I can’t uncover any remaining errors or
improve it any further.”
When those eyes are in the head of a professional copyeditor or proofreader, people and publishers are willing to
pay for renting them for a little while. Obviously they are — or you can make a
dinner reservation for me at the Salvation Army Bistro.
But when that other set of eyes happens to be mine, things
get a little tricky.
I was reading at age three. My great-aunt Etta Kaganov, a
New York City schoolteacher back in the 1940s–1980s, told her principal that
her three-year-old grandnephew was reading the New York Times. I think that when the principal disputed it, I was hauled
in to prove it.
[My father said a few weeks ago I was probably just reading
headlines. I’ll bet Aunt Ettie would beg to differ.]
Apparently I was a smart child. From the Jewish Community
Center on Staten Island where I went to nursery school in the early 1960s, some
way misinformed person thought it might be a good idea if I skipped
kindergarten and first grade and went
straight on to second grade.
Sure, that’d be a good
idea in the long run. Put an already-too-shy five-year-old in with second
graders. Add about seven years to get into the dating years, and watch the serious
emotional damage really take hold.
Anyway.
Thankfully I didn’t make the jump to second grade. However,
my folks did send me somewhere other than kindergarten for a day or so (maybe
to be tested at the school I would be attending?), and the report came back: Is
something wrong? The kid’s an idiot. He doesn’t belong here.
Hmmm. Let’s check his
eyesight. Maybe he can’t see the blackboard.
Ya think?
I’ve been wearing glasses since I was five years old. I
ended up in first grade, still a year younger than my classmates. It was the
first step in how I ended up graduating college at age 20 — not because I was a great student (I wasn't, by any means — after fifth grade, anyway), but more out of a
desire to get to work and get the hell out of school.
When I was a teenager, optometrists said, “Your eyes will
stop getting worse when you’re around 18.” I’m almost 53. Hasn’t happened yet.
My prescription even impresses optometrists.
Bottom line: My only set of eyes (everyone else’s other) has
sucked for years. They’ve always been pretty much correctable, though, as long
as I didn’t mind inch-thick lenses, and I didn’t. (Yes, I measured. And this
isn’t male enhancement.) Contacts never worked for me — first because the hard
ones were too painful in the mid-1970s, and when I tried them again about six
years ago, they ultimately didn’t give me the correction I needed.
I’ve said for years that my right eye wasn’t correcting as
well as my left. No one listened.
In October, I went in for an eye exam because I realized
that my right eye was no longer in focus, even with glasses. Like, not even
close. With my glasses on, I need to be two inches away from the computer
screen to read with my right eye only.
I’m at the optometrist, and we’re doing the usual “Is it
better now . . . or now? 1 . . . or 2? 3 . . . or 4? 5 . . . or 6?” If you have
glasses or contacts, you know the drill. But this time — after 47 years — with
the right eye, nothing is better.
Panic.
Think of how I make my living. Think of how a professional pianist might feel if she was losing the ability to move her fingers.
I peered around the device and asked the optometrist, “Can
you please tell me what the hell is going on here?”
She reveals nothing and does a few more tests, which only
exacerbate my dread.
“I’m going to recommend you for a cataract evaluation.”
To be continued . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)